Why lawyers’ posts often go unnoticed
Most lawyers’ posts read like a legal bulletin: a statute, a ruling, a link. The business owner scrolling past does not stop, because it is not clear what it changes for them. The post that works starts from a real worry (“My co-founder wants out, what happens now?”) and offers a first step, honest about its limits.
Many professionals also hesitate to post. On r/LinkedInTips, users report that they only post when they have something useful to say, and that they fear being judged (Reddit thread). For a lawyer that is an asset: clients ask you questions every week that are worth a post, provided you anonymise them completely.
The rules to check before you publish
Lawyers’ advertising and confidentiality are regulated, and the rules differ by jurisdiction. In the United States, for example, the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct are a reference point, but each state sets its own rules, so check those of your bar before starting a series of posts. Two habits hold everywhere.
- Never publish anything that could identify a client or a file, even lightly altered: a composite example beats a real story in disguise.
- Never promise an outcome or compare your firm with others: a post informs, it does not guarantee anything.
These templates are therefore informational. They are not legal advice and do not replace your reading of your own bar’s rules.
7 LinkedIn post templates for a lawyer
1. The question you always get
Structure: the question as it arrives, the short answer, the nuance that changes everything.
Example: ““My employer offers me a negotiated exit, do I sign?” The question I hear most in employment law. Short answer: not on the spot. An exit agreement is negotiable: the payment, the end date, unused leave. Before signing, ask three things: what do I receive, when, and how does it affect my unemployment benefits? I break down all three in the comments.”
2. The mistake a well-read contract avoids
Structure: the mistake, what it costs, the clause that would have prevented it.
Example: “A shareholder agreement signed “to get it done” is often silent on the one question that eventually comes up: what happens when one partner wants to leave? Without an exit clause or a valuation rule, you negotiate under pressure with former friends. Three clauses to reread this month: approval of share transfers, exit, and valuation. If one is missing, talk about it now, not on the day of the disagreement.”
3. The myth to correct
Structure: the common belief, why it is wrong or incomplete, what to remember.
Example: ““I never signed anything, so I am not bound.” One of the sentences I hear most in commercial disputes. An email exchange, an accepted quote or invoices paid without objection can be enough to show an agreement. It is not an absolute rule, it depends on the facts, but remember this: before writing “let us see later”, reread what you have just accepted.”
4. The calendar nobody checks
Structure: the deadline, who it concerns, the action for this week.
Example: “Shop owners: have you noted the end date of your commercial lease? Many find out too late, when the time to act is short. This week, pull out your lease, find the end of the current period and the form required to give notice or ask for renewal. One line in your calendar means a negotiation you prepared instead of one you endured.”
5. The file told without the file
Structure: a reconstructed typical situation, the course of action in three steps, the practical lesson. State clearly that it is a typical situation, not a real file.
Example: “Typical situation, not taken from a real file: an entrepreneur has waited months for an invoice to be paid and hesitates to write. Three steps. One: check that the contract or quote states the price and due date. Two: a clear, factual, dated formal demand. Three: only then consider court. Most unpaid invoices are settled at step two, when the letter is precise.”
6. Behind the scenes
Structure: one concrete habit from your day, what it teaches you, what the reader can take from it.
Example: “Before every meeting I prepare the same question: “Where do you want your situation to be in a year?” Not “what do you want to win.” The answer changes the strategy: a client who wants to preserve a relationship does not run a matter like one who wants a ruling. What is your version of that question?”
7. The news item, translated into consequences
Structure: the change in one sentence, the official source, what it changes for one specific kind of reader.
Example: “A new text changes the rules on estates? Do not just relay it. Say who it applies to, what it changes for a family planning a transfer, and link the official source. The reader will not remember the statute, they will remember “this concerns me, and here is what to do”. Always cite the public source and say nothing beyond what it says.”
How to publish these templates without losing your evenings
Pick a fixed day and one client question a week. The principle is the same as for other regulated professions: our post templates for an accountant rest on the same idea, a real question, a useful answer, no client information. For more ways to open a post, browse our LinkedIn hooks and the library of LinkedIn post templates.
If you post rarely and want a first circle of readers who react, read what the rules say about LinkedIn engagement pods before deciding what to do: LinkedIn’s rules are clear on artificial engagement, and your professional rules ask for extra caution.
To keep your visibility up at a human pace, with interactions coming from real readers, you can try Podavera: create a free account (20 credits included at sign-up).